Evidence on influence. Perspective on progress.Independent · Source-linked · AI-assisted research

Power project

New England Clean Energy Connect

Québec–Lewiston corridor, Maine · Transmission

In service — documented

The 1,200 MW line entered commercial operation on January 16, 2026, after a referendum and litigation interrupted its development.

A transmission connection, not a new power station. Hourly imports depend on available supply and dispatch.

Last documented milestone:
Sources checked: September 7, 2026

Developer / operator
NECEC Transmission / Avangrid; Hydro-Québec
Technology
High-voltage direct-current transmission

What the equipment is rated to do

Transmission transfer capability
1,200 MW
Original rating ↗

Capacity is not annual energy output or guaranteed availability. MW and MWh describe different quantities.

The documented hurdles

The dated trail

  1. Voters approve restrictions

    The Maine court describes a referendum that effectively halted the project.

  2. Court orders further factfinding

    The court identifies a conditional vested-rights protection and remands for findings rather than itself resolving every factual issue.

  3. Jury verdict supports proceeding

    Avangrid reports that the Cumberland County jury found in its favor on vested rights.

  4. Commercial operation begins

    EIA records the start of commercial operation. Its later January analysis also documents interrupted imports during severe cold.

Read the story

Blocked in 2021. Carrying power in 2026. ↗

Open the supporting records

  1. 1. Operational analysis · U.S. Energy Information Administration

    NECEC enters service; winter trade flows change

    Transfer capacity is not guaranteed hourly delivery. The report describes a dated operating period, not current dispatch.

    Publication: 2026-01-30 · Checked: 2026-09-07
    Location in source: Opening paragraphs; January 16 start and January 24–27 power-flow discussion

    Source record: necec-eia-operation
  2. 2. Court opinion · Maine Supreme Judicial Court

    NECEC Transmission: referendum and vested-rights decision

    The court remanded for factual findings on vested rights; this was not itself the later jury verdict or an operating authorization.

    Publication: 2022-08-30 · Checked: 2026-09-07
    Location in source: Paragraphs 2, 20 and 51–53; disposition on pages 38–39

    Source record: necec-2022-opinion
  3. 3. Developer statement · Avangrid

    Avangrid reports the NECEC jury verdict

    A party’s account of the verdict, not an independent assessment of project benefits.

    Publication: 2023-04-20 · Checked: 2026-09-07
    Location in source: Statements following the Cumberland County jury decision

    Source record: necec-2023-verdict